I think I am most mad because Ophelia and Hamlet could have gotten married- The Queen commented at her funeral she wished Ophelia could have been Hamlet's wife- and she spurned his love because of her father's order. Ironically, his ordered caused the whole rage in which Hamlet threw Ophelia around and meant that Polonius would spy on Hamlet to find the cause of his madness and the result was his own death at Hamlet's hand.
Hamlet is a complicated mess of secrecy and play-acting that says to me- be honest! Then you won't get caught in a web of lies that might result in your death!
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Cassidy- Act 5 Allusions
fjeojgoefwfTwo Biblical Allusions for ACT V
"There is special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now, 'tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be now; it it be not now, yet it will come. The readiness will come."
1) The sparrow- a small bird in a Bible story in which God determines its fate. this is an allusion to Matthew 10: 29-31.
"There is special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now, 'tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be now; it it be not now, yet it will come. The readiness will come."
1) The sparrow- a small bird in a Bible story in which God determines its fate. this is an allusion to Matthew 10: 29-31.
29 Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father.
30 But the very hairs on your head are numbered
31 Fear not therefore, you are of more value than many sparrows.
2) "The readiness is all" - an allusion to Matthew 24: 36-44
"No One Knows the Day or Hour"
36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My
Father only.
Father only.
37 But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man
be.
be.
38 For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and
giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark
giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark
39 and did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be.
40 Then two men will be in the field: one will be taken and the other left
41 Two women will be grinding at the mill: one will be taken and the other left.
42 Watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming.
43 But know this, that if the master of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed his house to be broken into.
44 Therefore you also be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.
*Hamlet, in this quote to Horatio, means that God is the controller of everything, even something as little as a sparrow's death. Everything happens for a reason. If something is supposed to happen
now, it will. If it’s supposed to happen later, it won’t happen now. What’s
important is to be prepared. Since nobody knows what the future will hold. Only be ready for whatever comes. I believe that is when Hamlet knows that his time is short.
Monday, November 19, 2012
Slade Ransdell: Act 5 Characters and Response
Characters
Laertes: Duels with Hamlet and lands a death blow, but he ends up poisoned as well. After being faced with death, he understands Hamlet's situation and quest and forgives him.
Ophelia: Drowns in a river after falling from a willow tree.
Claudius: Condemns his wife, nephew, and Laertes to death with poison, but then is destroyed by his own treachery and forced to drink the poisoned wine.
Gertrude: Mistakenly drinks from Hamlet's goblet and dies.
Gildenstern and Rosencrantz: Are executed by the King of England for betraying Hamlet.
Horatio: Lives to tell the story of the events that led to the tragedy at the castle.
Fortinbras: Returns from Poland to mourn Hamlet's death and honor his life. He then accepts the responsibility of ruling Denmark.
1st Clown: Gravedigger who dares to banter with Prince Hamlet
2nd Clown: Another gravedigger
Priest: He who performs Ophelia's funeral rites the sparseness of which Horatio vehemently objects to.
Osric: A courtier who is held in contempt by both Hamlet and Horatio
Response
The final act for me came as a rather surprising conclusion. I had expected for Hamlet and Laertes to both exact their revenge, but I had never suspected that so many people would suffer because of their actions. Ophelias death was the final straw that lead Laertes to use poison, and poison is what seemed to be the ultimate downfall of the royal family. Gertrude accidentally drank the poisoned wine and Claudius was stabbed and forced to drink poison as well. Finally, Hamlet was cut by a poisoned blade and doomed to die a slow death. I had expected this to happen, but what I didn't expect was that so many others would die in the process of Hamlet's revenge (Gertrude, Ophelia, Guildenstern, Rosencrantz, Laertes)
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Language- Shannon ACT 5
1) their even-christian: their fellow christian
The grave diggers are talking about inequality between them and the royalty
2) sconce- head
This adds to this disrespect shown to the dead bodies.
3) quiddities- logical subleties
This tone relates to the silliness with which the grave differ would avoid Hamlet's questions
4) by the card- to the point
Hamlet's is frustrated, and wants to get to the point.
5) yeoman's- dependable and substantial
This word helps to contribute to his point.
6) stick fiery off- stand out brightly
This is simple enough; It means to stand out, be noticeable.
The grave diggers are talking about inequality between them and the royalty
2) sconce- head
This adds to this disrespect shown to the dead bodies.
3) quiddities- logical subleties
This tone relates to the silliness with which the grave differ would avoid Hamlet's questions
4) by the card- to the point
Hamlet's is frustrated, and wants to get to the point.
5) yeoman's- dependable and substantial
This word helps to contribute to his point.
6) stick fiery off- stand out brightly
This is simple enough; It means to stand out, be noticeable.
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Act 5- Personal Response- Erika Kehrt
I did not like the ending AT ALL! I thought Hamlet was going
to outsmart the King and Laertes, by figuring out their plan and seeking
revenge on them both in an honorable way. However, everything back fired on
him. During the whole play he was worried about killing King Claudius when he
had not confessed his sins so that he would go to the place where he deserved.
But Hamlet was killed as well as the King and didn’t have a chance to confess
his sins; therefore, he was in the same situation as King Claudius. Personally I
am happy King Claudius died because he tried killing Hamlet for his own sake. I
found it kind of sad that the Queen died though. I truly didn’t think she was a
bad person because Shakespeare was writing in the time period where women were inferior
to men, so I feel like she was kind of forced into that marriage. Although I know
she was completely innocent I don’t think she was as bad as they made her out
to be.
I was happy at the fact that Laertes and Hamlet forgave each
other before their deaths because that illuminates the good people they both
are. Before Hamlet went to the fencing match against Laertes I found it quote
ironic that Shakespeare inserted into the play Hamlets doubts about
participating in the dual; however, he ignored his doubts and went anyway.
After this little scene I knew that the fate of Hamlet wasn’t good. It was
obvious to me something bad was going to happen because he stated that if it is
meant to be it will happen.
Act 5- Key Passages- Erika Kehrt
Act 5, Scene 1, Pg.152,
Lines 183-195
In this seen Hamlet picks up the skull of Yorick and
starts reminiscing on old memories he has with this jester. This seen is one of
the most significant soliloquys Hamlet says throughout the play. The reason is
because when Hamlet picks up his old friend’s skull it makes him realize the
value of life. He states that life is not really worth much because you will
just end up dead and decayed. When one is dead and gone your status as a human
being has no worth anymore. It doesn’t matter if you were Alexander the Great
or some peasant everyone is equal in heaven. This seen illuminates that Hamlet
is finally giving up, life has no worth to him anymore so what’s the point on
continue living.
Act 5, Scene 1, Pg.
154-155, Lines 254-287
In this scene Hamlet steps forward after Laertes has just
professed his love for his sister and jumped into the grave. After Hamlet and
Laertes stop wrestling Hamlet confesses that he had to step forward because he
was tired of listening to Laertes overdramatize his love for Ophelia. He states
that if someone wanted to see true love for Ophelia it was him they wanted to
see. This scene was also significant because it revealed that Hamlet truly did
love Ophelia and always had. It also illuminates that every bad event that
could occur in Hamlet’s has, this foreshadows that his fate is leading towards a
terrible ending. Hamlet doesn’t have ANY reason to live now his father was
killed, his mother is married to his father’s murderer, and the love of his
life drowned herself. Therefore, he has ultimately given up on life and has
accepted his fate.
Act 5, Scene 2, Pg. 170,
Lines 354-360
This is the last scene of Hamlet’s life. This scene is significant because it is the last words of Hamlet life. In these lines it was the end of the play. Hamlet dies with these words. For nearly the entire play, Hamlet struggled with the words of his father's ghost asking him to get revenge against Claudius for having killed King Hamlet. Now, Claudius is also dead by Hamlet. Gertrude, Hamlet's mother, and the one whom the ghost requested Hamlet to leave alone, is also dead. There is no one left to carry on the family line, so there is definitely silence. Also, these lines reflect on the fact that he is dying, and will not be a part of anything more in life. The rest of his life is silence. His life ended too soon, leaving a hole of silence where years of living should be. Hamlet realizes he needs to rely on Horatio to tell the true story.
Matty G: Clarification Questions & Personal Response Act 5
Clarification Q's:
- How does Hamlet come back to
- Why would Hamlet agree to fight Laertes?
- Was he not concerned at all that Laertes might be trying to exact his revenge?
- Did Hamlet ever have a plan to kill the king or did the opportunity just come about?
- How did the weapons get switched?
- Do we ever find out if the ghost was appeased or not after Hamlet kills Claudius?
Answer to #3:
Hamlet did seem to be aware that Laertes was a better fencer than himself. However, the idea that Laertes would attempt to kill him during the dual never seemed to occur to him. I don't understand how he had not thought of that possibility after Laertes became furious at the sight of Hamlet at the graveyard and tackled him. Hamlet was responsible for Laertes father's death, which led to his sister, Ophelia, going crazy and her death. As clever has Hamlet was it seems odd that these thoughts didn't cross his mind.
Personal Response:
I really enjoyed reading Hamlet. It was filled with suspense, lies, and murder, making it interesting throughout. The hardest part was understanding the Shakespearean writing. However, watching the movie along with reading it cleared up several parts that were difficult to understand by just reading them. I was surprised the ghost never made another appearance and also the role Fortinbras played. I assumed he would take back his kingdom by force; not by showing up and everyone being dead.
Act 5-Carli: Language and Personal Response
Language
1) my gorge rises: I feel sick, or nauseated. -Scene 1 Line 187
Hamlet says this when he is holding his old friend Yorick's skull. It makes him sick to think he is holding the skull of a once very important person to him, that he loved him and once kissed the dead lips he was looking at.
2) cozenage: trickery, the act of tricking of decieving someone. -Scene 2 Line 67
Hamlet uses this word when he talks about the evil deeds the king did in manipulating various things in Hamlets life, like the death of his father and turning his mother into a whore.
3) lapwing: a bird that draws intruders away from its nest and was thought to run around when hatched with its head in the shell. -Scene 2 Line 184
This is a reference to Osric as he leaves, his hat being the shell.
4) o'ercrows: triumphs over, overtakes -Scene 2 Line 355
Hamlet states that the poison has overtaken him, his death is coming fast.
5) cries on havoc: proclaims slaughter or mayhem -Scene 2 Line 366
Fortinbras shows up and sees all the dead bodies so he knows chaos or mass murders have taken place.
Personal Response
I loved the way it all ended, not because they all died but just how they did. It was so unexpected and ironic. It was so clever. It wasn't sad to me just because its hard for me to see emotion or drama in the text. It seems so blunt and straight forward that I can't feel emotional about it. Watching this scene in the movie will definitely change that I believe. I am glad that Horatio lived and that Hamlet stopped him before he drank the poison. If Hamlet would have just acted from the beginning and avenged his father right away, none of this would have happened. He could have saved a lot of lives by killing him sooner as ironic as that is. But overall I loved that story and especially the surprising ending.
1) my gorge rises: I feel sick, or nauseated. -Scene 1 Line 187
Hamlet says this when he is holding his old friend Yorick's skull. It makes him sick to think he is holding the skull of a once very important person to him, that he loved him and once kissed the dead lips he was looking at.
2) cozenage: trickery, the act of tricking of decieving someone. -Scene 2 Line 67
Hamlet uses this word when he talks about the evil deeds the king did in manipulating various things in Hamlets life, like the death of his father and turning his mother into a whore.
3) lapwing: a bird that draws intruders away from its nest and was thought to run around when hatched with its head in the shell. -Scene 2 Line 184
This is a reference to Osric as he leaves, his hat being the shell.
4) o'ercrows: triumphs over, overtakes -Scene 2 Line 355
Hamlet states that the poison has overtaken him, his death is coming fast.
5) cries on havoc: proclaims slaughter or mayhem -Scene 2 Line 366
Fortinbras shows up and sees all the dead bodies so he knows chaos or mass murders have taken place.
Personal Response
I loved the way it all ended, not because they all died but just how they did. It was so unexpected and ironic. It was so clever. It wasn't sad to me just because its hard for me to see emotion or drama in the text. It seems so blunt and straight forward that I can't feel emotional about it. Watching this scene in the movie will definitely change that I believe. I am glad that Horatio lived and that Hamlet stopped him before he drank the poison. If Hamlet would have just acted from the beginning and avenged his father right away, none of this would have happened. He could have saved a lot of lives by killing him sooner as ironic as that is. But overall I loved that story and especially the surprising ending.
Johns Act 5 Themes and Personal Repsonse
Themes:
- Twists of Fate- I found this to be one of the main themes in act five. It seems that the King will get away with another murder, this time to the son of King Hamlet. Laertes and Claudius plan the murder of Hamlet and it completely backfires. Hamlet says before he goes to fence Laertes that his fate is in God's hands and whatever happens to him will happen according to the will of God, and it seems that the fate of Laertes and Claudius was turned around due to their scheming plans and attempt to murder Hamlet. It seems that by their attempt to take another life, their fate was turned around and, despite killing Hamlet in the end, their plan completely backfired. Instead of forgiving Hamlet for the murder of Polonius and the madness he has caused in the kingdom, they end up killing basically anyone of any significance in the kingdom. The twist of fate ends up giving Claudius his own death sentence as well as the Queen and Laertes.
Personal Response:
This act completely shocked me. I had no clue that when the word "tragedy" was used to describe Hamlet, it meant an all out killing. I find it fitting that Hamlet is later recognized for his actions when everyone doubted him and called him mad. King Claudius was awarded his own death after attempting to kill Hamlet. It seems like this act is comparative to how life works sometimes. When we make a wrong decision or two out of our own selfish desires, it turns out to hurt those we love in more ways than we could imagine, even though we didn't mean for it to. I found this act to be a very good ending to a suspense filled book. By it ending this way, it leaves almost all questions answered and it begins to show insight for the future of this country. It was ultimately disappointing Hamlet had to die, even though in the beginning we had a pretty good idea that he would end up dying.
Slade Ransdell: Act 4 Language/Response
- Cicatrice: scar: a mark left (usually on the skin) by the healing of injured tissue
Page 101, Line 4. Shakespeare used the word "cicatric" to describe the relationship between Denmark and England. When Claudius decides to send Hamlet to England he notes that England might be hesitant due to wounds that were inflicted by Denmark in the past. Hopefully the death of Hamlet will not only help those wounds, but it will get rid of Claudius' problem as well. - Imposthume: an abscess; to form an abscess.
Page 102, Line18. Shakespeare uses the word "imposthume" to describe the act of Fortinbras' military aspirations. Hamlet is appalled that so many lives would be lost to fight for a piece of land that holds little importance. He feels as though by attacking Poland, both peace and wealth will form an abcess and be consumed. - Swoopstake: in an indiscriminate manner
Page 109, Line 24. Shakespeare invents the word "swoopstake" to describe the manner in which Laertes conducts himself upon hearing of his father's death. Instead of remaining calm and investigating to find the cause and responsibility for his father's murder, he makes a big scene; drawing out both friend and foe. This is also a sort of criticism for the way that Laertes threatened the king. Claudius claims to be a friend of Laertes and his late father, if only to escape the edge of his sword.ResponseThis Act was full of twists and secrets, which made it fairly interesting to read. Claudius' response to the play is continued in his efforts to get rid of Hamlet. This gives the sense that Claudius suspects that Hamlet knows he is responsible for killing his father. His desire to kill/get rid of Hamlet is so great that he conspires with Laertes to help him get revenge for Polonius' death (which is ironic). Meanwhile, Hamlet is trying to get home and exact his vengeance on his uncle. Laertes acts as Hamlet's opposite due to his immediate anger and desire for venegeance. Without any concrete proof of the murderer, he barges into the castle and demands justice (which is the exact opposite of what Hamlet did).
Monday, November 12, 2012
Act 4- Personal Response- Erika Kehrt
This act was very frustrating and difficult to read, because
King Claudius is turning everyone against Hamlet when he is the one who needs
to be killed. I really don’t know what is going to happen between Laertes and
Hamlet, but I know that there is most likely going to be a big brawl between
them. I hate that Ophelia died, because I really wanted her and Hamlet to get
married, and for there to be a happy ending. I am looking forward to the next
act to see what else Claudius tries to do to kill Hamlet.
Act 4- Clarification Questions- Erika Kehrt
1.
What insult does Hamlet have for
Rosencrantz and why is this term fitting?
2. Why
is Gertrude so concerned with what Ophelia is saying in her madness?
3. Why
would Laertes demand the throne? Is he an heir?
4. Why
is Laertes upset by the manner of Polonius’ burial?
5. What is the significance of Hamlet
sending the letter about the ship he was on being taken over by pirates, and
was the letter true?
6. How will Laertes and the King insure
Hamlet’s death in their plot?
Answer to number 6:
Laertes and the King insure Hamlet's death by tricking him into fencing with Laertes because the King claims that when Hamlet found out about Laerte's high regard as a fencer he could not stop talking about it. The first plan is to switch Laerte's fencing sword out with a real sword and put a type of poison on the end, where if it even touches a part of the skin it should kill the person. However, if that plan does not work then the second plan is, while the two are fencing Laertes intends on wearing Hamlet out to the point in which he needs a drink of water and King Claudius will already have the cup ready for him (with poison in it) so that they will be sure to kill him if the first plan doesn't work.
Cassidy - Act IV Themes and Personal Response
I was debating on whether the theme of Act IV was either Disillusionment/Betrayal or Madness, but after reviewing the plots made in this part of the play, I believe that both are main themes.
- In the beginning of Act IV, Gertrude confronts Claudius that Hamlet has gone insanely mad. This could be an arguement as to whether this is dissillusionment on Gertrude's part or if Hamlet is really mad; or both.
- After hearing that Hamlet killed Polonius, Claudius decides to send Hamlet to England with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with sealed orders for the King of England to execute Hamlet. This is an example of betrayal of Claudius.
- After hearing about the news of their father Polonius's death, both Ophelia and Laertes are immediately consumed with madness. Laertes, assuming that Claudius killed his father, was notified that Hamlet was the slayer, so he decides to avenge his father by plotting to kill Hamlet. After hearing that Hamlet is on his way back to Denmark, both Claudius and Laertes discuss a plan to kill Hamlet, which is another act of betrayal of Claudius.
Personal Response
I must say that I am hooked on Hamlet as of now. Although I am sad about the death of Ophelia, I am stoked about reading the last act. I have a feeling that it may be sad, but I also believe that theres plenty of action in store. I enjoyed Act IV more than the first acts. I realized that not only Claudius is a murderer, he is also a hypocrite; helping Laertes avenge his father by helping him kill Hamlet, when Hamlet is trying to avenge his father by attempting to kill Claudius. Overall, I'm loving the book so far. Shakespeare rocks!!
- In the beginning of Act IV, Gertrude confronts Claudius that Hamlet has gone insanely mad. This could be an arguement as to whether this is dissillusionment on Gertrude's part or if Hamlet is really mad; or both.
- After hearing that Hamlet killed Polonius, Claudius decides to send Hamlet to England with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with sealed orders for the King of England to execute Hamlet. This is an example of betrayal of Claudius.
- After hearing about the news of their father Polonius's death, both Ophelia and Laertes are immediately consumed with madness. Laertes, assuming that Claudius killed his father, was notified that Hamlet was the slayer, so he decides to avenge his father by plotting to kill Hamlet. After hearing that Hamlet is on his way back to Denmark, both Claudius and Laertes discuss a plan to kill Hamlet, which is another act of betrayal of Claudius.
Personal Response
I must say that I am hooked on Hamlet as of now. Although I am sad about the death of Ophelia, I am stoked about reading the last act. I have a feeling that it may be sad, but I also believe that theres plenty of action in store. I enjoyed Act IV more than the first acts. I realized that not only Claudius is a murderer, he is also a hypocrite; helping Laertes avenge his father by helping him kill Hamlet, when Hamlet is trying to avenge his father by attempting to kill Claudius. Overall, I'm loving the book so far. Shakespeare rocks!!
Act 4-Carli-Symbols and Allusions and Personal Response
Ophelia's Flowers
After learning of her fathers murder, Ophelia starts to go insane. Although she's not as foolish or confused as she seems. She passes out different flowers to different people that all represent something. Many of the representations are ironic. She has rosemary for remembrance, probably of her father. Fennel and columbine were both insults to the King. Fennel represents flattery and columbine represents adultery.shes obviously referring to the king and Gertrude's relationship. She's hands out a daisy which represents faithlessness, then she states that she would hand out violets (which represent faithfulness) but they withered when her father died. Everyone assumes she's crazy and is making no sense, when in reality she knows exactly what's going on. She shows and expresses this in the symbolism of her flowers.
Saint Valentines Day
Ophelia references this day in a song she sings. Back then, they knew Valentines Day as the belief that the first girl seen by a man on the morning of this day was his true love. I believe Ophelia is still lovesick regarding Hamlet. Everything went wrong for her, she lost Hamlet and now her father. She's goes on to say that the man answers that he would have married her if she hadn't slept with him. This refers back to Hamlets opinion of women and the things he said to her like go to a nunnery. It's along the same lines, I think she is referring back to that conversation and how she loved Hamlet and was misled by him and thought he never loved her.
Personal Response
I was really sad to learn of Ophelia's fate. I felt like she was the most innocent character in the book and she seemed to lose everything, eventually her life. I think it's so ironic that the King is discussing Laertes' revenge on Hamlet for murdering his father, when Hamlet is waiting to get revenge on the king for murdering his father. I think this whole triangle is very interesting and I'm curious to see how it's going to unfold.
After learning of her fathers murder, Ophelia starts to go insane. Although she's not as foolish or confused as she seems. She passes out different flowers to different people that all represent something. Many of the representations are ironic. She has rosemary for remembrance, probably of her father. Fennel and columbine were both insults to the King. Fennel represents flattery and columbine represents adultery.shes obviously referring to the king and Gertrude's relationship. She's hands out a daisy which represents faithlessness, then she states that she would hand out violets (which represent faithfulness) but they withered when her father died. Everyone assumes she's crazy and is making no sense, when in reality she knows exactly what's going on. She shows and expresses this in the symbolism of her flowers.
Saint Valentines Day
Ophelia references this day in a song she sings. Back then, they knew Valentines Day as the belief that the first girl seen by a man on the morning of this day was his true love. I believe Ophelia is still lovesick regarding Hamlet. Everything went wrong for her, she lost Hamlet and now her father. She's goes on to say that the man answers that he would have married her if she hadn't slept with him. This refers back to Hamlets opinion of women and the things he said to her like go to a nunnery. It's along the same lines, I think she is referring back to that conversation and how she loved Hamlet and was misled by him and thought he never loved her.
Personal Response
I was really sad to learn of Ophelia's fate. I felt like she was the most innocent character in the book and she seemed to lose everything, eventually her life. I think it's so ironic that the King is discussing Laertes' revenge on Hamlet for murdering his father, when Hamlet is waiting to get revenge on the king for murdering his father. I think this whole triangle is very interesting and I'm curious to see how it's going to unfold.
Matty G: Personal Response & Language Act 3
Language:
1. "...periwig-pated fellow tear a passion to tears.." pg. 137 line 2
- An actor wearing a wig on his head, just simply yelling too loudly and ruining an important part of the play.
- In this context, it is Hamlet's passion. His passion is trying to avenge his father's death. At this point, he is discussing with one of the actors before they perform the play. He is pestering the actor to make sure he gets this part right. This part of the play is crucial in Hamlet's clever plot to get his uncle to "commit" to his dreadful crime. If the actor half halfheartedly condones this part of the mini-play, or ruins it by just yelling the lines extremely loud, it will not register to Claudius what is really going on. In order for it to hit home, the lines Hamlet inserted in the play must be expertly delivered.
- deliberately hidden
- Hamlet discusses his true meaning for adding a few lines in the play with Horatio. He describes his uncle's evil deed as an occulted one; for he has managed to hide and trick all of Denmark into thinking that the old king died of some poisonous bite.
- did you think I was talking about sex?
- In this scene Hamlet provides several witty, comical remarks to Ophelia. This is a phrase I was unfamiliar with until now. Hamlet was flirting with her I suppose in front of Polonius and the rest of the crowd. He was a bit rude to her but this conversation they had also implies his view of women. As the conversation carry's on, he becomes funnier and his remarks are more vulgar towards her. Again, it just shows what he thinks of women.
- bitter, harsh
- Hamlet described a particular scene in the mini-play as "Wormwood!" This statement followed a line from the Player Queen about how she would never marry a second time if her husband was to die. Obviously he yells this through the theater in order for everyone to hear, although it was directly stated for his mother's ears. Hamlet uses the mini-play to make many other ironic statements and toy with Claudius and his mother about their actions.
- tricked or cheated
- Hamlet finally discusses with his mother why he is truly upset. He tells her that she has been cozened by an evil man that murdered her husband and Hamlet's father. He informs her of what Claudius is responsible for and that that is the origin of his acting mad. The fact that she went and married him and all the other things that are so wrong about their quick marriage is what has him so distraught.
Personal Response:
This
play has really grabbed my attention. I am dying to know if Hamlet
actually gets the opportunity to right his father’s wrongful death
through the killing of his uncle. I still haven’t thrown out the
possibility that Hamlet might commit suicide in the end of the story. I
was excited when Polonius died, because it affirmed me that Hamlet was
serious in his intentions and not a coward. I don’t really have any
dislikes, except my ongoing dislike for the old English style of
writing. Other than that, this is an interesting play.
Matty G: Personal Response & Who's Who? Act 4
Who's Who:
King Claudius- ships Hamlet back to England; devises plan with the angry Laertes to kill Hamlet in a rigged fencing dual.
Queen Gertrude- explains Ophelia's death to Laertes. She is also unaware of the plan to kill Hamlet. Who knows what will happen to her in act 5.
Rosencrantz- his friendship with Hamlet is not really a friendship and hasn't for a while. However, after this act it is clear to both Hamlet and Rosencrantz where they stand with each other.
Guildenstern-his friendship with Hamlet is not really a friendship and hasn't for a
while. However, after this act it is clear to both Hamlet and Guildenstern where they stand with each other. He is more loyal to the king than Hamlet. Hamlet knows this and never discloses any crucial information with them.
Hamlet-after killing Polonius, he actually seems mad at this point. I believe he has lost his sense of acting and has became crazy. The King has him shipped back to England, however his ship was attacked by pirates and he somehow informs the king by letter that he will be returning to Denmark with some kind of news.
Laertes- shows up at the King's palace wanting revenge. Claudius convinces him he is innocent and Laertes plans to attain his revenge for his father's murder and his sister's death by killing Hamlet in some way.
Fortinbras- is moving his soldiers across Denmark. Probably has other plans on his mind but I'm assuming act 5 will reveal that.
Ophelia- goes crazy and drowns in some body of water. It isn't clear if it's suicide or not, but that's what it seems like due to her recent behavior.
Ophelia- goes crazy and drowns in some body of water. It isn't clear if it's suicide or not, but that's what it seems like due to her recent behavior.
Personal Response:
I
actually like this play. I’m hooked and want to continue reading, but
don’t want to get ahead of myself. Blood, gore, and betrayal all add up
to make this an enticing piece of literature. Ophelia’s death I think
will cause Hamlet to commit suicide in the end. He will either commit
suicide for that reason, or because he will feel guilty after killing
Claudius. Laertes might even kill him in their dual. I don’t know exactly. What I am
almost positive of though is that Hamlet will die before the end of the
play. I just don’t see Shakespeare allowing Hamlet to live happily ever
after.
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Act IV Personal Response- Shannon
The events keep getting worse and worse, yet I think worse is yet to come. The King flat out says he wants Hamlet killed to Laertes. No more does he hide his desire for Hamlet's death. He claims he loves the Queen, and that is the only thing keeping him from outright killing Hamlet. What surprises me is that he plans on letting Laertes kill him, and that Laertes- who seemed calm, collected, and concerned in the first act- is seething with a desire for revenge. I wonder how the story is going to work out. I feel like Hamlet, despite appearing mad to the point that even us the readers who know his thoughts are beginning to doubt his sanity, is more in control than it seems. He and Laertes will probably dual, and Laertes will be killed. Then, Hamlet shall kill the King. That is my prediction.
Act IV Symbols &/or Allusions- Shannon
The Sponge (Sc. 2, Beginning Line 13)-
Hamlet refers to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern both as sponges for the King. A sponge is a tool used for cleaning up messes, as well as soaking up material and expunging the material once again. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are the King's sponges. He uses them to try to fix Hamlet, aka "The Mess". They are also used as spies to gather information and tell it to the King.
The Worm (Sc. 3, Beginning Line 23)-
This is a symbol and an allusion both. The allusion is to the Diet of Worms which was an event in Rome. More importantly, in my opinion, is the worms' association with death and how Hamlet uses them to degrade the King. First, worms are decomposers. They are a symbol that everything and everyone living must die. The worms decompose all equally; none escape. Second, the worms are used to bring down the King because not only does everybody have to die, but the same worm that decomposes the King's body can be used by a lowly poor man for fishing.
The Owl was a Baker's Daughter (Sc. 5, Line 44-45)-
This line struck me as odd, so I looked it up. As the story goes, the Baker's Daughter was making bread for Jesus but decided the dough was too big and so reduced it in half. It swelled anyways, and scared her. She cried out three times, sounding like an owl does today, and was turned into the creature. The change the woman underwent to become the owl became linked with trauma over the years. This must be the reason why Ophelia said this line.
Hamlet refers to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern both as sponges for the King. A sponge is a tool used for cleaning up messes, as well as soaking up material and expunging the material once again. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are the King's sponges. He uses them to try to fix Hamlet, aka "The Mess". They are also used as spies to gather information and tell it to the King.
The Worm (Sc. 3, Beginning Line 23)-
This is a symbol and an allusion both. The allusion is to the Diet of Worms which was an event in Rome. More importantly, in my opinion, is the worms' association with death and how Hamlet uses them to degrade the King. First, worms are decomposers. They are a symbol that everything and everyone living must die. The worms decompose all equally; none escape. Second, the worms are used to bring down the King because not only does everybody have to die, but the same worm that decomposes the King's body can be used by a lowly poor man for fishing.
The Owl was a Baker's Daughter (Sc. 5, Line 44-45)-
This line struck me as odd, so I looked it up. As the story goes, the Baker's Daughter was making bread for Jesus but decided the dough was too big and so reduced it in half. It swelled anyways, and scared her. She cried out three times, sounding like an owl does today, and was turned into the creature. The change the woman underwent to become the owl became linked with trauma over the years. This must be the reason why Ophelia said this line.
John's Act 4 Key Passages and Personal Response
- Act 4, Scene 4, Pg. 128, Lines 31-67
Hamlet is basically just questioning himself as to why he's doing what he's doing. He doesn't know why he keeps putting off his revenge. It seems as if he doesn't understand why he's thinking so much or why he's having so many convicting thoughts about the revenge. He believes he has everything essential for revenge, he just can't seem to bring himself to the final act of it.
- Act 4, Scene 5, Pg. 137, Lines 205-214
King Claudius is trying to save his own butt in these lines. This is important simply because it sets up the relationship between Laertes and the King as they plot to kill Hamlet. The King wants Laertes to know for a fact that it wasn't him that killed Polonius so he wasn't to lose his crown or kingdom after all of the people became angry. He covers himself and just throws Hamlet to the wolves so the blame couldn't come back on him.
- Act 4, Scene 7, Pg. 143, Lines 128-140
This is possibly the most important passage in this Act. The King is telling Laertes, and basically stating he is in on it to, that it is alright for him to attempt to murder Hamlet. Throughout these lines, their true feelings come to the surface and we don't have to keep guessing about what they are going to do about this. This passage also builds further suspense as to what the readers think will happen later.
Personal Response
I thought this act could have possibly been the most suspenseful. A lot happens in this act that starts to make this story look more and more like a tragedy. For me, this act further built my hate for the King. At the end of the last act, I felt sympathetic for him because he seems remorseful for his wrongdoing. Now, he basically gives Laertes the sword in telling him he can kill Hamlet. His desire to have power over the kingdom is going to lead to the death of many more people.
Friday, November 9, 2012
Personal Response Act III- Shannon
Personally, I was shocked at Hamlet's insistance that Ophelia go to a
nunnery. I realize this is projection, but just because she won't see
him any longer does not mean that she cannot marry anyone else. More
shocking was his dismissal of their past relationship.
I am curious to see how The Queen will act after her meeting with
Hamlet
nunnery. I realize this is projection, but just because she won't see
him any longer does not mean that she cannot marry anyone else. More
shocking was his dismissal of their past relationship.
I am curious to see how The Queen will act after her meeting with
Hamlet
Act III Theme- Shannon
The theme I found interesting in this Act was stereotypical sex roles.
There duty is to be a wife, and a dutiful one. The act begins with
Hamlet and Ophelia's encounter. Since she spurned if his love, he
thinks she is not worthy of being a wife any longer and therefpre the
only thing left to her is to go to a nunnery. The other display of
this theme is the relationship between Hamlet and his mother. He sees
her marriage to his uncle as the ultimate betrayal. When he meets with
her, he constantly refers her marriage vows. This is symbolic of his
view of her as only a mother and wife. Her betrayal of her vows is
more than breaking a promise; it is betrayal to her role as a woman.
There duty is to be a wife, and a dutiful one. The act begins with
Hamlet and Ophelia's encounter. Since she spurned if his love, he
thinks she is not worthy of being a wife any longer and therefpre the
only thing left to her is to go to a nunnery. The other display of
this theme is the relationship between Hamlet and his mother. He sees
her marriage to his uncle as the ultimate betrayal. When he meets with
her, he constantly refers her marriage vows. This is symbolic of his
view of her as only a mother and wife. Her betrayal of her vows is
more than breaking a promise; it is betrayal to her role as a woman.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Cassidy - Act 3 Key Passages and Personal Response
Hamlet's Soliloquy - scene 1, 57-91:
In this scene, Hamlet thinks about whether to live or take his own life, due to his father's murder and his mother's quick remarriage to the one responsible for his father's death. In this soliloquy, Hamlet ponders on whether to grieve over his melancholy or avenge his father by command of his ghost. He debates which act is better to persue; committing murder or committing suscide. However, his belief and fear of the afterlife prevent him from slaying himself. He also wonders who would bear the injustice of life, and the aftermath of such a tragedy. His fear of death keeps him from taking the easy way out and instead he continues plotting his revenge against Claudius. This passage is significant because this is the "do or die" moment for him; what his final decision is on whether or not he'll avenge his father. This passage is an eye-opener andkeeps you in suspense of what is bestowed next.
Hamlet Reenacts the Murder - scene 2, 153-288:
In this scene, the players are performing in front of Claudius and the rest of the congregation. Hamlet changes some lines and scenes of the play. This "Mousetrap" is to examine Claudius's reaction when he witnesses a reenactment of the murder he committed. Hamlet and Horatio gaze upon the king when the scene approaches. After watching the murder, Claudius rises, asks for light, and flees. However, Claudius's outcome afterwards is not what Hamlet expects. In a room alone, he falls on his knees and asks for forgiveness for his sins. This is when we realize that Claudius is truly sorry and is surrounded with guilt for murdering and betraying is own flesh and blood.
Hamlet Confronts His Mother/ Ghost Appears - scene 4, 9-142
This is the scene when Hamlet finally approaches his mother and reveals what deeds she has done, though she doesn't realize the betrayal she has become apart of by marrying her late husband's brother. A lot of misunderstanding occurs in this passage. Thinking Claudius is the one behind the tapestry, Hamlet draws his sword through it, killing Polonius instead. Also, when the Ghost appears, Hamlet sees it, but Gertrude does not. She assumes that Hamlet has gone mad when he is talking to the unseen ghost. This passage is importantbecause Hamlet reveals his reason for his melancholy and madness, and what occurs later on is suspenseful such as, how will everyone react to Polonius's death and to Hamlet's truthful tone.
Personal Response
Act 3 was very entertainging. It mademe keep askingquestions in suspense. There is some action and secrets revealed, and I was not expecting some details that happened as well. Overall, I loved Act 3 and I cannot wait to read the rest of the play and figure out what happens.
In this scene, Hamlet thinks about whether to live or take his own life, due to his father's murder and his mother's quick remarriage to the one responsible for his father's death. In this soliloquy, Hamlet ponders on whether to grieve over his melancholy or avenge his father by command of his ghost. He debates which act is better to persue; committing murder or committing suscide. However, his belief and fear of the afterlife prevent him from slaying himself. He also wonders who would bear the injustice of life, and the aftermath of such a tragedy. His fear of death keeps him from taking the easy way out and instead he continues plotting his revenge against Claudius. This passage is significant because this is the "do or die" moment for him; what his final decision is on whether or not he'll avenge his father. This passage is an eye-opener andkeeps you in suspense of what is bestowed next.
Hamlet Reenacts the Murder - scene 2, 153-288:
In this scene, the players are performing in front of Claudius and the rest of the congregation. Hamlet changes some lines and scenes of the play. This "Mousetrap" is to examine Claudius's reaction when he witnesses a reenactment of the murder he committed. Hamlet and Horatio gaze upon the king when the scene approaches. After watching the murder, Claudius rises, asks for light, and flees. However, Claudius's outcome afterwards is not what Hamlet expects. In a room alone, he falls on his knees and asks for forgiveness for his sins. This is when we realize that Claudius is truly sorry and is surrounded with guilt for murdering and betraying is own flesh and blood.
Hamlet Confronts His Mother/ Ghost Appears - scene 4, 9-142
This is the scene when Hamlet finally approaches his mother and reveals what deeds she has done, though she doesn't realize the betrayal she has become apart of by marrying her late husband's brother. A lot of misunderstanding occurs in this passage. Thinking Claudius is the one behind the tapestry, Hamlet draws his sword through it, killing Polonius instead. Also, when the Ghost appears, Hamlet sees it, but Gertrude does not. She assumes that Hamlet has gone mad when he is talking to the unseen ghost. This passage is importantbecause Hamlet reveals his reason for his melancholy and madness, and what occurs later on is suspenseful such as, how will everyone react to Polonius's death and to Hamlet's truthful tone.
Personal Response
Act 3 was very entertainging. It mademe keep askingquestions in suspense. There is some action and secrets revealed, and I was not expecting some details that happened as well. Overall, I loved Act 3 and I cannot wait to read the rest of the play and figure out what happens.
Act 3- Carli: Themes and Personal Response
Twists of Fate
Out of all the themes this caught my attention because of the scene where Hamlet was talking to his mother and Hamlet kills Polonius through the curtain. This was seen as a twist of fate because Polonius was simply just a nosy fool, all along Hamlet has been wanting to avenge his father and kill Claudius, but instead Polonius ends up getting killed. An innocent but stupid man in the wrong place at the wrong time. Hamlet was even hoping that the man was the king, he didn't even know who he stabbed. All along the reader just assumes, especially after what the play revealed, that Hamlet is soon going to kill Claudius. But that doesn't happen at all, at least not yet. All of sudden Polonius ends up dead, not someone many probably predicted would be killed.
Personal Response
I liked this act the best so far. I was shocked how upset the King got when watching the play, he was so obvious that he was guilty. He even stopped the whole play. I had also been waiting to see when the king would actually admit either to someone else or to himself that he murdered old Hamlet. He finally did and for some reason I kept doubting that he was actually guilty. But now I know for sure that he did murder his brother. The way he admitted it was interesting. I couldn't tell if he felt bad about it, or felt bad that someone was suspicious of him. I also thought it was confusing why Hamlet would just stab the curtain without even knowing who was behind it.
Out of all the themes this caught my attention because of the scene where Hamlet was talking to his mother and Hamlet kills Polonius through the curtain. This was seen as a twist of fate because Polonius was simply just a nosy fool, all along Hamlet has been wanting to avenge his father and kill Claudius, but instead Polonius ends up getting killed. An innocent but stupid man in the wrong place at the wrong time. Hamlet was even hoping that the man was the king, he didn't even know who he stabbed. All along the reader just assumes, especially after what the play revealed, that Hamlet is soon going to kill Claudius. But that doesn't happen at all, at least not yet. All of sudden Polonius ends up dead, not someone many probably predicted would be killed.
Personal Response
I liked this act the best so far. I was shocked how upset the King got when watching the play, he was so obvious that he was guilty. He even stopped the whole play. I had also been waiting to see when the king would actually admit either to someone else or to himself that he murdered old Hamlet. He finally did and for some reason I kept doubting that he was actually guilty. But now I know for sure that he did murder his brother. The way he admitted it was interesting. I couldn't tell if he felt bad about it, or felt bad that someone was suspicious of him. I also thought it was confusing why Hamlet would just stab the curtain without even knowing who was behind it.
John's Act 3 Clarification Questions and Personal Response
Clarification Questions:
- What do we discover about Hamlet's true feelings towards Ophelia?
- Was the King's reaction to the play what you anticipated it to be at the end of Act 2? Why or why not?
- Do you think Hamlet purposely killed Polonius?
- Is King Claudius remorseful for his actions? Why or why not?
- Did Hamlet truly accomplish what he intended to?
Personal Reaction:
This Act in the book really draws the readers attention. It isn't just another act that keeps us guessing about what will happen next. Hamlet got the reaction he was hoping for out of his uncle by putting on the play and it seems kind of fitting that his uncle is in an absolute out roar about the whole situation simply because of his own guilt. I feel bad in a sense for Hamlet due to the fact that everyone thinks he's lost his mind when all he seeks to do is avenge the death of his father. I just can't begin to imagine trying to explain to my mom, in his particular situation, what has happened. I think Hamlet feels no only betrayed but alone in a sense that everyone seems to be against him or in the plot to stop the way he was acting. I hate now that Hamlet will be accused of the murder of Polonius, an already sneaky character, whom I believed needed to die, as bad as that sounds.
Act 3- Personal Response- Erika Kehrt
I am so glad that hamlets plan worked and he now has proof
that King Claudius was guilty and can take proper revenge. I am not happy with
the fact that Hamlet killed Polonius, thinking it was the King, but he did not
deserve to die. I also found it kind of shocking that he didn’t really feel
remorse for killing Polonius, his reaction was bland like he shrugged it off
and was like aw he should have died, that’s what he gets for being nosy. I don’t
know how the queen is going to handle all of the news that Hamlet told her, so I
think that will be interesting how that will unfold. I am really hoping she doesn’t
tell the king what Hamlet had said though. This is getting very interesting and
I look forward to the next Act to see what happens when Hamlet goes to England,
if he goes to England.
Act 3- Characters- Erika Kehrt
1. King
Claudius- Claudius was continuously
depicted as the antagonist, due to his actions. He has portrayed himself to be the top dog, the
almighty powerful ruler. However, when the play was performed, and Claudius saw
that the plot of the play was based on the true events of him murdering the
late King Hamlet, he freaked out and became very grief stricken! These features
proved to Hamlet that Claudius was the murderer of the late King Hamlet.
2. Hamlet-
In Act 3 Hamlet comes off as a little bit mad himself; it
seems that he is so intelligent and wise that he is on a whole other level then
everyone else. He is trying to be portrayed as crazy so that he can ultimately resolve
the unending question: Did Claudius kill the late King Hamlet or not? Hamlet is
depicted throughout this act as very ridiculing. He is very harsh to Ophelia in
the first scene; however, his mood changes towards her while they are both
watching the play and is more playful/teasing towards her. The depiction of
Hamlet being portrayed as ridiculing is continued throughout scene 4 when he is
scolding his mother about her poor actions. Also, Hamlet killed Polonius, and
that is a side of him we haven’t seen before.
3. Gertrude- Shakespeare
was writing during the time when women were seen as very weak with no say. Gertrude is depicted
as a reasonable and well off individual, but Hamlet conveys that she has
committed a great mistake because she married his uncle. Hamlet continually
explains to Gertrude that she is a horrible woman for accepting Claudius. It is
evident that Gertrude is oblivious to the immoral act committed by Claudius,
but because Hamlet knows, he cannot allow his mother to live with such a
horrible man. Gertrude is portrayed as being submissive to those around her.
She is easily persuaded by both Claudius and Hamlet; causing her to become
confused. Shakespeare attempts to convince the audience that Gertrude cannot
form her own opinions as she relies on others to do so for her.
4. Ophelia-
It is still apparent that Ophelia still has feelings for
Hamlet, although she is placed as bait so they can tell if Hamlet is crazy out
of love or not. She did not appear that much in Act 3 that much other than in
scene 1. It appeared that she was a bit upset when he was professing how he
felt towards her. She responded to him, in what seemed like a childish tone,
when he told her that he did not love her nor had he ever. At the very end of
scene 1 Ophelia became vulnerable professing how she prayed Hamlet got better
for everyone’s sake. However, their mood towards each other changed in the
scene 2 when Hamlet was playfully teasing her about sex with him throughout the
play.
5. Polonius-
He was very conniving, setting Ophelia as bait in order
to prove the reason of Hamlet’s insanity. Since Polonius was very nosy, it
resulted in his death. Hamlet stabbed the curtain, thinking it was Claudius;
however, it was really Polonius. It appeared that Polonius was always in the
middle of everything, and wanted to see Hamlet’s fall; however, he died
instead.
6. Rosencrantz
& Guildenstern-
These two characters appear to be two
of Hamlets really good friends; however, Hamlet claims in this act that he does
not trust these two at all. The reason is because they would go and tell the
king if he said anything out of place. Hamlet was also, supposed to go to England
with these two in order to fulfill a wish of King Claudius’.
Slade Ransdell: Act 3 Response/Symbols and Allusions
Symbols and Allusions
The prominent symbol in Act III of Hamlet would be the play "The Mousetrap" in which he attempted to prove whether or not the ghost of his ‘father’ was trustworthy and honest. The play was about a Duke named Gonzago, who was murdered by his newphew, Lucianus, who poured poison in his ear; very similar to his Hamlet senior's death. Hamlet chose this play in order to reenact the death of his father, and to observe Claudius for any signs of guilt . It symbolizes the exact murder of Hamlet’s father by his uncle. When people are confronted with a situation similar to something they are guilty of, they will express it in their facial expressions and body language. It is in this way that Hamlet was able to confirm the ghosts claims and take vengeance on his uncle.
Another pervading symbol in Act 3 is found when Hamlet confronts his mother in scene 4. Polonius is hiding behind the drapes in an attempt to spy on Hamlet and is alarmed when the queen begins to yell for help. Panicking, he answers her call and is met with an unfortunate fate. Hamlet wasn't aware of his presence in the room, so he was startled and drew his sword when Polonius yelled. Before the old chamberlain could react, Hamlet had already buried his sword in the curtain and drew blood from his unknown adversary. It was never Hamlet's intention to hurt anyone other than his uncle, but, nevertheless, Polonius lay dead when the curtain was drawn back. This tragedy is one of the most important symbols regarding "Hamlet's" overall moral theme: Quests for vengeance often result in more than the intended death.
Response
Act 3 really caught my attention due to the final unraveling of tension that had been brewing between Hamlet and Polonius. However, Polonius' death came as a shock to me. I knew that Hamlet disliked him, but it is apparent now that Hamlet will not let anything get in his way of revenge. Even though Hamlet resisted the urge to kill Claudius that night, I understand that it was only so he could do it later when the treacherous king won't have a chance to repent. After much waiting, it seems as though Hamlet may finally take his vengeance and assume the throne of his father.
The prominent symbol in Act III of Hamlet would be the play "The Mousetrap" in which he attempted to prove whether or not the ghost of his ‘father’ was trustworthy and honest. The play was about a Duke named Gonzago, who was murdered by his newphew, Lucianus, who poured poison in his ear; very similar to his Hamlet senior's death. Hamlet chose this play in order to reenact the death of his father, and to observe Claudius for any signs of guilt . It symbolizes the exact murder of Hamlet’s father by his uncle. When people are confronted with a situation similar to something they are guilty of, they will express it in their facial expressions and body language. It is in this way that Hamlet was able to confirm the ghosts claims and take vengeance on his uncle.
Another pervading symbol in Act 3 is found when Hamlet confronts his mother in scene 4. Polonius is hiding behind the drapes in an attempt to spy on Hamlet and is alarmed when the queen begins to yell for help. Panicking, he answers her call and is met with an unfortunate fate. Hamlet wasn't aware of his presence in the room, so he was startled and drew his sword when Polonius yelled. Before the old chamberlain could react, Hamlet had already buried his sword in the curtain and drew blood from his unknown adversary. It was never Hamlet's intention to hurt anyone other than his uncle, but, nevertheless, Polonius lay dead when the curtain was drawn back. This tragedy is one of the most important symbols regarding "Hamlet's" overall moral theme: Quests for vengeance often result in more than the intended death.
Response
Act 3 really caught my attention due to the final unraveling of tension that had been brewing between Hamlet and Polonius. However, Polonius' death came as a shock to me. I knew that Hamlet disliked him, but it is apparent now that Hamlet will not let anything get in his way of revenge. Even though Hamlet resisted the urge to kill Claudius that night, I understand that it was only so he could do it later when the treacherous king won't have a chance to repent. After much waiting, it seems as though Hamlet may finally take his vengeance and assume the throne of his father.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Slade Ransdell: Act 2 Themes and Response
Themes
One of the main themes in Act 2 is hesitation. Hamlet is hesitant to kill his uncle because he is doubtful that the ghost was telling the truth. Fearful that the apparition was actually a demon, he has to make sure that Claudius actually did commit the vile acts of which he has been accused. On the other hand, Claudius and Gertrude worry about Hamlet, and do not hesitate in trying to cheer him up. They automatically believe that his love for Ophelia is the source of his sadness and neglect to find definite proof.. Unlike Hamlet who needs the proof before he will act. Perhaps Claudius himself is worried that Hamlets depression will make him question the circumstances of his father's death. Either way, the king and Hamlet are contrasts in the ways they handle themselves. Claudius does not hesitate, Hamlet does.
Response
I liked act 2 because the story is finally starting to unravel. The rising action had started and Hamlet is beginning to show signs of a moral struggle. This is good because it shows that at least he isn't a ruthless killer. Despite his feeling towards his uncle, he is determined to make absolutely sure he is guilty before serving justice. He does this by using the play, which I'm sure is going to be an important part of Act 3. Overall I like the story so far and am interested to see how the rest of it will turn out between Ophelia and Hamlet as well as how Claudius will react to the upcoming play.
One of the main themes in Act 2 is hesitation. Hamlet is hesitant to kill his uncle because he is doubtful that the ghost was telling the truth. Fearful that the apparition was actually a demon, he has to make sure that Claudius actually did commit the vile acts of which he has been accused. On the other hand, Claudius and Gertrude worry about Hamlet, and do not hesitate in trying to cheer him up. They automatically believe that his love for Ophelia is the source of his sadness and neglect to find definite proof.. Unlike Hamlet who needs the proof before he will act. Perhaps Claudius himself is worried that Hamlets depression will make him question the circumstances of his father's death. Either way, the king and Hamlet are contrasts in the ways they handle themselves. Claudius does not hesitate, Hamlet does.
Response
I liked act 2 because the story is finally starting to unravel. The rising action had started and Hamlet is beginning to show signs of a moral struggle. This is good because it shows that at least he isn't a ruthless killer. Despite his feeling towards his uncle, he is determined to make absolutely sure he is guilty before serving justice. He does this by using the play, which I'm sure is going to be an important part of Act 3. Overall I like the story so far and am interested to see how the rest of it will turn out between Ophelia and Hamlet as well as how Claudius will react to the upcoming play.
John's Act II Characters and Personal Response
- Reynaldo- servant of Polonius. He is basically being ordered to spy on Laertes and see what he is up to in Paris.
- Polonius- trying to find out what his son is doing in Paris. He becomes frightened that Hamlet has been to see his daughter and gives Hamlet's letter to his daughter to the King.
- Ophelia- brings her father news that Hamlet has been to see her. She seems to act innocent as to show her father that none of this can be her fault.
- King Claudius- basically orders Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to "check on" Hamlet. Shows interest for Hamlet in Act II, probably because he fears Hamlets grief could ultimately hurt him.
- Rosencrantz & Guildenstern- old friends of Hamlet. Both were sent by the King and Queen to see what else was wrong with Hamlet.
- Hamlet- recieves Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with questions of why they have visited him. He seems to show Polonius hostility when he arrives. Towards the end of the Act he basically curses himself and calls himself a coward for doing nothing in the revenge of the murderous King. He reveals his plan to attack the conscious of the hopefully guilty King in a play put on by the actors. He also reveals that he has a bit of trouble when it comes to trusting the ghost due to the belief that he could possibly be the devil's work.
I thought Act II was a bit harder to understand as compared to Act I, possibly because we weren't introduced to the film before we read. I thought you had to do a lot more guessing in this Act when it came to the feelings, attitudes, and tones between each of the characters. I thought Rosencrantz and Guidenstein were set up as spys for the King, even though they have been friends with Hamlet since childhood. Towards the end of Act II, I think we start to really see the true feelings of Hamlet towards his uncle. He plans to discover whether the ghost was being honest to him in telling him that it was his uncle that killed his father. I think this plan to to enter the lines into this play will draw a very distinct reaction from his uncle. Personally, I think his uncle will soon discover that Hamlet knows what happened to his father.
Act 2- Personal Reaction- Erika Kehrt
I didn’t think Act 2
was all that bad; however, I liked act 1 better. I thought that act 2 scene 1
was kind of irrelevant because all it talks about was Polonius sending someone
to Paris to spy on Laertes and Ophelia professing to her father Hamlets strange
behavior towards her previously that day. The only reasoning I could think of
why Shakespeare placed act 1 scene 1 in Hamlet was to continue the theme of
Appearance and Reality and also to relate the idea of Hamlet’s insanity to his
love for Ophelia. Furthermore, I was kind of surprised when Ophelia told her
father of Hamlet’s strange actions because I predicted in the previous response
to act 1 that I thought Ophelia was just telling her father what he wanted to
hear; however, she was really going to go behind his back and spend time with
Hamlet. Now I am starting to wonder if I was wrong because I did not expect her
to tell her father if he came and saw her, and on top of that let him read the
letter he wrote her.
Act 2 scene 2 felt
like it dragged on a little. I started to zone out when Hamlet was talking to
the actors. And it was kind of hard to follow because I didn’t really
understand what they were talking about. However, I started zoning back in when
Hamlet was conjuring up his plan to reveal King Claudius’ true self. I found it
really clever the way he intends on revealing if the king is the true murderer
or not. I have a feeling act 3 will be a very pivotal act within Hamlet and be
a turning point. In Hamlets last soliloquy it illuminates his true hatred
towards the king, and alludes to the fact that he will seek revenge, although the
audience does not know how yet.
Act 2- Language- Erika Kehrt
1. Expostulate: to attempt to dissuade someone from some course or decision by
earnest reasoning.
Pg. 67, Line 86. Shakespeare uses the
word “expostulate” to attempt to illuminate Hamlet’s insanity by using parallelism
to compare two totally different things and making them join into one. He
attempts to dissuade the king and queen from the original course of the
conversation by explaining his meaning of wisdom. Polonius explains his meaning
of wisdom to help illuminate his reasoning behind why he thinks Hamlet is going
crazy.
2. Fain: gladly; willingly.
Pg. 69, Line 131. Shakespeare uses the
word “fain” to illuminate the fact that Polonius is trying to prove his trustworthiness
to King Claudius. He claims that he will gladly prove to King Claudius that he
is loyal and honorable because he wants Claudius to believe that the reason
Hamlet is crazy is due to his daughter. And he would “fain” prove that to the
king to illuminate that he is coming out with this information in the kings
best interest, so maybe that his stepson/cousin might get the help he needs.
3. Appurtenance: something subordinate to a more important thing; an accompanying
part or feature of something; accessory.
Pg. 77, Line 371. Shakespeare uses the
word “appurtenance” in the line to indicate that in order to welcome all of the
actors he has to go through all of the polite customs of greeting one another
such as shaking hands. By uses this word it just implies that this customary
greeting was subordinate to what is to come after (which was the actors acting
out speech that Hamlet wrote in order to see if King Claudius was his father’s
murderer or not).
4. Epitaph: a brief statement written on a tomb or gravestone.
Pg. 83, Line 525. Epitaph is used in
order to portray how adamant Hamlet is about the actors well treatment while
staying in the kingdom. He is saying he would rather have a bad statement
written on his tombstone oppose to the actors going around bashing them (and
giving them a bad reputation) while they were still alive because they were treated
very poorly. So Hamlet makes this claim to Polonius using such harsh tone so
that he understands how strongly he feels about the actor’s well treatment.
5. Offal: waste parts of a butchered animal; refuse; garbage.
Pg. 84, Line 580. By Shakespeare using
the word “Offal” in Hamlet’s thoughts to himself, it contributes to the
negative/harsh tone of Hamlet’s soliloquy. In the line that Offal is used,
Hamlet is reminiscing on how horrible a person his uncle is. He states that if
he would have known how horrible a man his uncle was earlier he would have
fattened up the vultures with King Claudius’ “Offal” or his intestines. And Hamlet
continues stating all the negatives of his uncle; Remorseless,
treacherous, sex-obsessed, etc.
Act 2- Comment to Slade's Themes- Erika Kehrt
The main theme that came to my mind for Act 2 was trust.
For instance, Polonius is very untrusting of his son in act two scene one as he
has Reynaldo ask about Laertes’s activities in Paris. I believe the central theme
of trust is very prominent in both acts so far. Trust is something that keeps
the relationship between Hamlet and his father’s ghost strong and without trust
Hamlet would never believe that Claudius had murdered King Hamlet and without
trust Hamlet would have never believed that his father had returned as a ghost
to bring justice to the kingdom. Trust is also important between Hamlet and
Ophelia because Hamlet truly loves Ophelia but because their trust is not very
strong, Ophelia is easily persuaded to think that Hamlet only wants to use her
and then throw her away. Although the trust between Hamlet and Claudius is not
strong after Hamlet’s encounter with King Hamlet’s ghost, trust is still the
key that keeps Claudius in power all this while as Claudius has every other
person’s trust with the power of the kingdom at his feet. I believe this theme
of trust is going to be very important in future acts of Hamlet.
Carli- Act 2 Key Passages and Personal Response
Scene 2.1 76-121
This section of passages was important because it gives a deeper look at Polonius and Ophelia's relationship. Ophelia goes straight to her father with news about Hamlet, the specific person he forbade her to see. This either tells us that she is extremely close with her father and respects him no matter what the consequences, even though she loves Hamlet; or that she is that worried about Hamlet that she felt desperate in order to get him help and save him. Polonius's response is surprising and important as well. He feels guilty that he forbid their love and takes responsibility for Hamlet's grief. He thought Hamlet was around Ophelia for the wrong reasons, but now he realizes that he really did love her. So his intentions in the beginning were right as a loving but controlling father. This gives the reader more respect for Polonius than he first aquired. This is all ironic too because he feels so guilty and thinks he's responsible for Hamlets grief, when there are so many other things that are responsible for his sadness and depression. Their so obvious but no one seems to understand or get that his fathers death and his mother and uncles wedding would be traumatizing. Everyone is so oblivious.
Scene 2.2 549-606
This passage is extremely significant because this is the first time Hamlet snaps out of his depression. This is when he really starts to take in consideration what his fathers ghost told him about getting revenge. Hamlet admits to moping around and needs to man up and take vengeance on his uncle. He is going to do this by the play that involves a murder. He wants yet another hint at if his uncle really did murder his father. He believes the ghost completely, he just wants visual proof to further persuade his revenge.
Personal Response
I didn't enjoy this act as much as I did the first act. It wasn't as eventful in my opinion. I got a little bored when Hamlet was talking to the players and Polonius. One thing I did love was how the act ended with Hamlets plan to reveal his uncles guilty conscious. It built up suspense and left me curious to find out how the uncle reacts to the play. It showed for the first time the real hatred Hamlet has for his uncle now and reassurance that Hamlet is planning to follow through with the ghosts wishes.
This section of passages was important because it gives a deeper look at Polonius and Ophelia's relationship. Ophelia goes straight to her father with news about Hamlet, the specific person he forbade her to see. This either tells us that she is extremely close with her father and respects him no matter what the consequences, even though she loves Hamlet; or that she is that worried about Hamlet that she felt desperate in order to get him help and save him. Polonius's response is surprising and important as well. He feels guilty that he forbid their love and takes responsibility for Hamlet's grief. He thought Hamlet was around Ophelia for the wrong reasons, but now he realizes that he really did love her. So his intentions in the beginning were right as a loving but controlling father. This gives the reader more respect for Polonius than he first aquired. This is all ironic too because he feels so guilty and thinks he's responsible for Hamlets grief, when there are so many other things that are responsible for his sadness and depression. Their so obvious but no one seems to understand or get that his fathers death and his mother and uncles wedding would be traumatizing. Everyone is so oblivious.
Scene 2.2 549-606
This passage is extremely significant because this is the first time Hamlet snaps out of his depression. This is when he really starts to take in consideration what his fathers ghost told him about getting revenge. Hamlet admits to moping around and needs to man up and take vengeance on his uncle. He is going to do this by the play that involves a murder. He wants yet another hint at if his uncle really did murder his father. He believes the ghost completely, he just wants visual proof to further persuade his revenge.
Personal Response
I didn't enjoy this act as much as I did the first act. It wasn't as eventful in my opinion. I got a little bored when Hamlet was talking to the players and Polonius. One thing I did love was how the act ended with Hamlets plan to reveal his uncles guilty conscious. It built up suspense and left me curious to find out how the uncle reacts to the play. It showed for the first time the real hatred Hamlet has for his uncle now and reassurance that Hamlet is planning to follow through with the ghosts wishes.
Cassidy - Clarification Questions and Personal Response ACT II
Clarification Questions
1. Is Polonius curious or concerned about Laertes when he orders Reynaldo to spy on him in Paris? Does he not trust him or his own advice he gave to Laertes?
2. Is Ophelia telling Polonius the honest truth?
3. Why does Hamlet refer to Denmark as a "prison"?
4. Why does Shakespeare include a lot of spying in Act II?
5. Will Hamlet's plan to reenact his father's murder in the play backfire?
#3's Answer - Hamlet is saying that he is trapped in his own meloncholy. With his mother's marriage to Claudius and the fact that the ghost persuades him to avenge his father when he claims that Claudius is his murderer, Hamlet feels he is carrying a lot of burdens, which makes him feel imprisoned. Another explanation is that avenging his father is his new responsibility and purpose instead of deciding his own destiny in life. This could be compared to a kind of prison sentence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Personal Response
Act II is entertaing considering the fact that it includes a bunch of undercover work and concealment. Polonius goes behind his own son's back by asking one of his servents to spy on him in Paris and make note of his whereabouts, informs the king and queen his opinion about why Hamlet is so filled with madness, and the king and queen summoning two friends of Hamlet to figure out his problem and notify their majesties about the situation. The story is becoming very interesting and suspensful. I personally am enjoying it and can hardly wait to see what happens next.
1. Is Polonius curious or concerned about Laertes when he orders Reynaldo to spy on him in Paris? Does he not trust him or his own advice he gave to Laertes?
2. Is Ophelia telling Polonius the honest truth?
3. Why does Hamlet refer to Denmark as a "prison"?
4. Why does Shakespeare include a lot of spying in Act II?
5. Will Hamlet's plan to reenact his father's murder in the play backfire?
#3's Answer - Hamlet is saying that he is trapped in his own meloncholy. With his mother's marriage to Claudius and the fact that the ghost persuades him to avenge his father when he claims that Claudius is his murderer, Hamlet feels he is carrying a lot of burdens, which makes him feel imprisoned. Another explanation is that avenging his father is his new responsibility and purpose instead of deciding his own destiny in life. This could be compared to a kind of prison sentence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Personal Response
Act II is entertaing considering the fact that it includes a bunch of undercover work and concealment. Polonius goes behind his own son's back by asking one of his servents to spy on him in Paris and make note of his whereabouts, informs the king and queen his opinion about why Hamlet is so filled with madness, and the king and queen summoning two friends of Hamlet to figure out his problem and notify their majesties about the situation. The story is becoming very interesting and suspensful. I personally am enjoying it and can hardly wait to see what happens next.
Matty G: Allusions & Personal Response Act 2
Allusions
One biblical allusion I noticed was the reference Hamlet made while speaking to Rosencrantz. "And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me. No, nor woman neither," It just reminded me that man was created from dust in the bible. He compares his loss of interest in humans to his interest in the dust that we technically really are. Basically, he could care less about the people around him. He uses this allusion to establish the severity of his depression. Comparing anything to the work of the All Mighty establishes great significance. Hamlet uses this allusion to display some of the issues he is dealing with. The moodiness and loss of interest he has experienced is clearly stated through his conversation with his two friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
The reference to Jephthah could be alluding to events to come between Ophelia and Polonius. Jephthah was one of the twelve judges of Israel, when it was under that form of government, who, going to fight against the Ammonites, vowed that if successful against them, he would sacrifice to the Lord the first thing that met him on his return home. His daughter coming out to welcome him, was accordingly offered up. Shakespeare loves to write about tradgedies. Therefore, what could be more tragic than having Hamlet's lover's father accidentley have his own daughter killed? I could be totally wrong but it would be very tragic and make for a good twist in the play. This could be a significant reference for some other reason as well.
Personal Response
One biblical allusion I noticed was the reference Hamlet made while speaking to Rosencrantz. "And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me. No, nor woman neither," It just reminded me that man was created from dust in the bible. He compares his loss of interest in humans to his interest in the dust that we technically really are. Basically, he could care less about the people around him. He uses this allusion to establish the severity of his depression. Comparing anything to the work of the All Mighty establishes great significance. Hamlet uses this allusion to display some of the issues he is dealing with. The moodiness and loss of interest he has experienced is clearly stated through his conversation with his two friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
The reference to Jephthah could be alluding to events to come between Ophelia and Polonius. Jephthah was one of the twelve judges of Israel, when it was under that form of government, who, going to fight against the Ammonites, vowed that if successful against them, he would sacrifice to the Lord the first thing that met him on his return home. His daughter coming out to welcome him, was accordingly offered up. Shakespeare loves to write about tradgedies. Therefore, what could be more tragic than having Hamlet's lover's father accidentley have his own daughter killed? I could be totally wrong but it would be very tragic and make for a good twist in the play. This could be a significant reference for some other reason as well.
Personal Response
I am still interested, and I’ll have to be honest and say that I was surprised by act 2. I like how a traveling play shows up and Hamlet will can conveniently use them to his advantage. In my opinion, Ophelia is too paranoid for her own good. Why would she tell on Hamlet if she somewhat loves him? I would think she would want to confront him to handle it herself. I am anxious and want to see how Claudius reacts to the play. It should be interesting. After act 2, it is obvious that Hamlet is having difficulty in obeying the ghost of his father's command. He has wasted some time in debating on whether or not to kill his unlce/dad. His hesitation has allowed doubt to creep up on him. He now has said he needs more proof than just the words of the ghost.
Monday, November 5, 2012
Shannon- Personal Response Act II
This is the act in which plenty of scheming occurs. First, Polonius schemes to undermine his sons reputation. The King and Queen conspire to use Hamlet's friends to find out what bothers him. Polonius decides to trick Hamlet into revealing what drives him mad by tricking Ophelia and Hamlet to be alone in a room while he and the royal couple hide nearby and observe. Finally, most importantly, Hamlet will try to trick his Uncle into revealing his guilt by having players perform a murder in his presence. I have a feeling that all this scheming will get complicated and will backfire on somebody.
Shannon- Important Passages Act II
Act/Scene/Lines
2/1/1-82: This passage is important because this is the act where Polonius sends Reynaldo to follow his son and slander his name with mild insults. This passage stood out to me because it seems an odd thing for a father who had just finished advising his son on the proper behavior to do. What could be the benefit in tarnishing a good reputation? Does Polonius believe that imperfections will make his son more accessible to the French people?
2/2/544-550 In this passage, Hamlet asks a player to add additional lines to his speech on "The Murder of Gonzago". It seems to me that Hamlet plans to make a jab at the King, or else reveal what he knows in a less-obvious manner. The King will sweat at the thought of being discovered as the murderer, and that is likely to make him ill-disposed towards Hamlet.
2/2/602-613 This excerpt is important because it further explains Hamlets reasoning for asking the players to perform the murder. He wishes to find out more substantial evidence than a mere ghost's sayings to convict his uncle before he avenges his father's death.
2/1/1-82: This passage is important because this is the act where Polonius sends Reynaldo to follow his son and slander his name with mild insults. This passage stood out to me because it seems an odd thing for a father who had just finished advising his son on the proper behavior to do. What could be the benefit in tarnishing a good reputation? Does Polonius believe that imperfections will make his son more accessible to the French people?
2/2/544-550 In this passage, Hamlet asks a player to add additional lines to his speech on "The Murder of Gonzago". It seems to me that Hamlet plans to make a jab at the King, or else reveal what he knows in a less-obvious manner. The King will sweat at the thought of being discovered as the murderer, and that is likely to make him ill-disposed towards Hamlet.
2/2/602-613 This excerpt is important because it further explains Hamlets reasoning for asking the players to perform the murder. He wishes to find out more substantial evidence than a mere ghost's sayings to convict his uncle before he avenges his father's death.
Friday, November 2, 2012
Slade's Response
I really enjoyed Act one due to the building suspense that ensues after the initial sighting of the ghost. Shakespeare's language was a little difficult to follow at first, but watching the play actually being acted out helped me to understand it alot better. Reading the play, I found it hard to detect exactly how much resentment Hamlet already had towards his uncle. However, after watching the movie it is apparent that Hamlet already had an extreme dislike towards him. I am interested to watch the story unfold as Hamlet struggles to battle right and wrong. I have no doubt that he would like nothing more than to take revenge on his uncle, but being as he was the only one to hear the ghost I am intrigued to see how he will respond.
Cassidy's Response
After first reading Act I of Hamlet I could hardly comprehend what the play was saying. The language just flew over my head; however, the movie helped me understand a lot better. Being mostly a visual learner, it opened my eyes to what the tone and the purpose were. Seeing and hearing the characters' attitudes in the movie seemed more reasonable for me because it shows the characters' emotions in every line and how Shakespeare could have imagined the play. Also, the blog about the language gave me a better understanding of what Shakespeare was referring to, which now makes a lot more sense.
Though it was hard to understand the play at first, I love how the play makes me think about what's going to occur next. So many questions like "Is the ghost really his father?" or "Is Hamlet going to take things a little too far?" circle around my mind. The play is suspenseful and it will make you keep guessing. I'm excited about what's going to happen next. Yes, I may be slow at learning the language, but really reading the script, paying attention to the movie, and possibly with a little help from some footnotes I'll get the hang of Hamlet. The mystery and drama of Hamlet is so far very enjoyable and I cannot wait to read and watch more of it.
Shannon- Personal Response
Shannon- Personal Reaction to Act 1
I thought that at times the reading was a little hard to follow, but I
understood most of it. I think it is interesting that the late King
warns Hamlet not to hate his mother; it is not her fault he says. His
wife began to unite with his brother before he was dead; how can he
not be mad about that? Then, not even 2 months later, she marries
again. How can the ghost not be angry with the Queen for this? I doubt
I am projecting, because Hamlet himself was angry. This is the story
the story on one front. There is war brewing i. the background
(another front) and I bet it is like Othello- it mirrors and is
metaphorical for the conflict in the castle. How Denmark fares out
there I predict is how Hamlet will do in his situation. There is a
third front to the story; I predict it is the love story of Ophelia
and Hamlet.
Shannon- Claryfying Questions
Shannon- Clarifying Questions:
1) Why did Hamlet make Horatio and Marcellus swear twice?Having sworn
once, why were the two reluctant to swear again?
2) What does "cap-a-pe" mean? Act 1, Scene 1, Line 212
3) Why were the King and Queen so insistant that Hamlet not mourn his
father any longer? How could they so easily lose their own grief,
especially the Queen?
4) What is the custom of Denmark for which the country is often mocked?
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Matty G: Themes & Personal Response Act 1
THEMES
The theme of betrayal is found throughout act 1. We learn at the end of act 1 that Claudius, Hamlet's uncle/ dad, is the murderer of the late King Hamlet. Claudius was King Hamlet's brother. To kill your own brother, marry his wife, and fool the people of Denmark are all examples of betrayal that Claudius has committed. Hamlet is informed by his dead father's soul of the terrible crimes Claudius is responsible for. Based on Hamlet's conversations it is obvious that he is going to seek revenge. The things he promises with his father's soul foreshadow events to come. Based on his mother's actions, she seems oblivious to what Claudius has done; that or she is just as evil as Claudius himslef and doesn't care that he murdered her husband. Claudius' actions show how evil he is. He has the nerve to tell Hamlet to get over his father's death and that he wants Hamlet to look at Claudius as his new father. He also speaks to Hamlet as though there is nothing wrong with marrying his mother, also his former sister-in-law.
PERSONAL RESPONSE
So far, I like the twisted plot and the potential this story has. It makes reading Shakespeare more interesting. Since it is Shakespeare, we all know that it will end in some tragic manor. At least that's my prediction. I'm intersted in seeing if the contrast beween Hamlet's family breakdown and Ophelia's normal family has any significance later in the story, as well as how the relationship between Hamlet and Ophelia turns out now that she is forbidden to see him.
The theme of betrayal is found throughout act 1. We learn at the end of act 1 that Claudius, Hamlet's uncle/ dad, is the murderer of the late King Hamlet. Claudius was King Hamlet's brother. To kill your own brother, marry his wife, and fool the people of Denmark are all examples of betrayal that Claudius has committed. Hamlet is informed by his dead father's soul of the terrible crimes Claudius is responsible for. Based on Hamlet's conversations it is obvious that he is going to seek revenge. The things he promises with his father's soul foreshadow events to come. Based on his mother's actions, she seems oblivious to what Claudius has done; that or she is just as evil as Claudius himslef and doesn't care that he murdered her husband. Claudius' actions show how evil he is. He has the nerve to tell Hamlet to get over his father's death and that he wants Hamlet to look at Claudius as his new father. He also speaks to Hamlet as though there is nothing wrong with marrying his mother, also his former sister-in-law.
PERSONAL RESPONSE
So far, I like the twisted plot and the potential this story has. It makes reading Shakespeare more interesting. Since it is Shakespeare, we all know that it will end in some tragic manor. At least that's my prediction. I'm intersted in seeing if the contrast beween Hamlet's family breakdown and Ophelia's normal family has any significance later in the story, as well as how the relationship between Hamlet and Ophelia turns out now that she is forbidden to see him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)